Your monitoring can only alert on the companies it knows to watch.
The Open Register turns Australian insolvency notices into company-level records and tests whether the names in your debtor book are connected to the right legal entities.
Then, where you provide your existing monitoring history, we compare what it caught. First test the population.
Then test the monitoring.
The alert can be correct and still never reach the customer you care about.
Your debtor ledger might say:
SettleEasy
The legal company might be:
A.C.N. 649 413 605 Pty Ltd
If the correct company was already attached to the customer and being monitored, your existing system may work perfectly.
But if the debtor record was never resolved to the right entity, the monitoring can be excellent and the control can still fail.
Company on the notice
ACN
Also trades, or traded as
Academy of Aesthetics Pty Ltd
654 093 455
BAREWOLF · BAREWOLF CLINICS · The BareZillian Clinics · Madame Wolf · Mr & Mrs Wolf · MENSTITUTE · BAREMAN COSMETICS · GEORJINA WOLF · SYZURA · ZE'EV
A.C.N. 649 413 605 Pty Ltd
649 413 605
SettleEasy · Aussie Homes Conveyancing · formerly SETTLE EASY - QLD PTY LTD
PCT Plumbing Tas Pty Ltd
667 791 791
BRUNY ISLAND PLUMBING · GUSH BUSTERS · HOBART PLUMBING MAINTENANCE · PCT SERVICES
Foduli Pty. Limited
003 805 972
JABAKHANJIS BUTCHERY
The information is public.
The control problem is making sure the customer in your book is connected to the company the public record is actually about.
The wrong company is
being watched.
The debtor name in your ERP does not resolve cleanly to the legal entity that should be monitored.
That is an entity-control gap.
The right company is being watched, but the event is missed.
The entity is correct, but the monitoring history does not show the relevant event.
That is a monitoring gap.
The Exposure Desk tests both.
See the public record we work from.
The Daily Register records the most significant insolvency event carried for each company published that day.
The Full Register carries the broader company-level record, including ACNs, processes, dates, practitioners, winding-up applicants, courts and hearings where published.
Both are free.
Before you replace your monitoring, audit the one you already have.
The Exposure Desk starts with your own historical debtor population.
First, we test whether the names in your book resolve to the legal companies that should have been monitored.
Then, where you provide your incumbent monitoring history, we test whether the relevant events were actually caught.
The point is not to prove your current system is bad. It is to answer a more useful question:
Where, exactly, did the control break, entity resolution or monitoring?
One Test. Four Outcomes.
1. Correct entity. Event caught.
Your incumbent worked. No incremental finding.
3. Wrong or unresolved entity.
The debtor record did not resolve cleanly to the company that appeared in the public insolvency record.
2. Correct entity. Event absent.
The right company was being monitored, but the relevant event is not present in the monitoring history supplied.
4. False match rejected.
A similar name looked relevant but belonged to a different legal entity.
If your current process works, the test should prove that too.
The backtest is not designed to manufacture a miss.
If the right entities were being monitored and the relevant events were caught, that is the result.
If the test reveals a repeatable gap, you can then decide whether it is worth controlling prospectively.
No replacement decision required before the evidence exists.
If the test finds a repeatable gap, Exposure Desk keeps testing for it.
The Exposure Desk keeps the company-resolution control running against your debtor population and tracks the agreed public insolvency lifecycle for the companies that matter to you.
It is designed to sit alongside an existing credit process, not force a wholesale replacement.
90-day pilot from A$9,000 · Ongoing from A$3,000/month
https://www.theopenregister.com/exposure-desk
